Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

20 April 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< April 19	April 21 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Savitech

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no wp:sigcov, fails wp:gng ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 16:09, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Taiwan. ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 16:09, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mercy Kenneth Okonkwo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources, fails wp:gng ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 16:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Nigeria. ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 16:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Social Democratic Party

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails to meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG and WP:NORG. The organization was established only two months ago and has not yet received any substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources. Additionally, it is not registered as a political party. The current article relies solely on a press release about its inception.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 15:46, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Bangladesh. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 15:46, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Popular Party

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails to meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG and WP:NORG. The organization was established only six months ago and has not yet received any substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources. Additionally, it is not registered as a political party. The current article relies solely on a press release about its inception.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 15:17, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Bangladesh. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 15:17, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ajdin Mujagić

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Bosnian men's footballer had a short professional career before moving to the second tier of Croatian football. The closest source that is not a transfer announcement is SportSport, but it only mentions his name in title. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:52, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 17:59, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—Per all above. Anwegmann (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reference count has more than doubled since the last "delete" !vote. Thoughts on the expansion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:12, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bijai Jayarajan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't appear to be notable upon search. Not to mention, the current sources are not WP:SIGCOV or seem to be press releases. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Technology, and India. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mohsen Afshani

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a procedural nomination. I declined the speedy tag this am, since the (dated) sources all date newer than the previous AfD (inappropriately closed as speedy delete by a non-admin closer). This latest incarnation is entirely sourced from Farsi outlets, so even with translation, I'm not comfortable with my own views on how direct the detailing is or how much is merely routine entertainment chatter. BusterD (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Iran. BusterD (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Captive Dreamer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect contested. There are not any sources on this person in this article that count for notability. The main source this article is based on, the WP:DAILYDOT, is at best marginally reliable and cannot count for notability. The other sources were repeating the Daily Dot and came out only days later, recounting their investigation with little or no added commentary that would help notability (the Italian source, the Tyee). All the other sources are non-sigcov mentions (The Verge, Mother Jones), or are completely unrelated and did not mention him whatsoever, including many sources from long before he existed as an internet personality, giving the article a serious WP:SYNTH problem (the Hill, the 2007 and 2020 sources, the 1974 source)

Secondly, even if he was notable, we should not have hijacked the redirect, because the primary topic for Captive Dreamer is still the book he named himself after.

To go down the list:

La Repubblica, recapping daily dot article, no new content X
1974 book review from before he existed, doesn't mention him X
The Tyee, recapping daily dot article, X
2020 article about the far-right, from before he existed as an internet personality, does not mention him X
The Verge, passing mention X
Daily Dot, sigcov but MREL and not usable to base a whole article on, not due weight or good for notability, X
Mother Jones, passing mention X
another 2020 journal article from before he existed, does not mention him X
The Hill, does not mention him X

There is not a single source that counts for notability on this article. Just re-redirect to that (i created the original redirect to the book, fwiw) PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I firmly disagree; I believe that I did the necessary work to verify the subject's notability, and that there is enough to establish his notability:
- I'm aware that there's currently no consensus on the reliability of The Daily Dot, which is why I've relied on it as little as possible, nearly exclusively to quote tweets from the subject and to summarize their investigation. Like in the case of Stonetoss, I avoided mentioning the identity and used language that still distinguishes between "Captive Dreamer" and the individual identified. I'd also want to add that Daily Dot is not automatically unreliable, and that sources we would consider reliable (like The Verge, or La Repubblica, which has no consensus here but is an established Italian newspaper) have cited the piece.
- Intellectual independence: as PARAKANYAA says, some sources are not intellectually independent from each other; for example the La Repubblica one largely just reports the Daily Dot investigation and summarizes it. It isn't a copy-paste either, and I've cited it to avoid citing a "no consensus" source as much as possible, per my first point. Where I disagree with PARAKANYAA is that all sources are dependent on The Daily Dot, which just isn't true. The one by Mother Jones was published before, the Verge one was published after but has a different angle and some different info, and the one by the The Tyee cites the Daily Dot repeatedly, but it says to have replicated some of the investigation itself, and adds a lot of new info, including everything surrounding the BC university and its president. It also has a Canadian angle throughout.
- Significant coverage: per the guidelines, it's defined as more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. Captive Dreamer is indeed not the main subject of either the Mother Jones nor the Verge one, but there are three whole paragraphs (in their subsection) dedicated to him in the former, and two in the latter, which to me is more than a trivial mention.
- Synth: some sources are indeed not related to Captive Dreamer, but I've used them purely for context bits where I wanted to use the highest quality source possible. For example, even though most sources on Captive Dreamer mention who David Koresh and Christian de la Mazière are, it made more sense to me to cite actual academic sources for these elements. There's never any amalgamation of information that isn't already put together in sources about Captive Dreamer, and I don't claim that these sources contribute to the subject's notability either.
That's all, hope that helps to establish notability. Cheers, WikiFouf (talk) 15:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:53, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Stöferle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded without improvement with the rationale, "Take to AFD. Works are cited by journals advocating Austrian economics." Well, yes, they are. With a high citation count of a whopping 7. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG, nor do they meet WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Austria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Manish Prakash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't seem to be notable - specifically, no WP:SIGCOV. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 14:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Finance, and India. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 14:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Ayrum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cites primarily one source ("The Republic of Armenia" by Richard Hovannisian) which does not characterize this military action as a battle. Propose redirect to Armeno-Georgian_War#Armenian_offensive which more closely matches Hovannisian. Armeno-Georgian War states:

"On 16 December the Armenian left flank, commanded by Ter-Nikoghosian, now advanced from Lori into Georgia proper on Bolnis-Khachen and Katharinenfeld, while Korolov's right flank captured Hairum. Georgian forces, that consisted mostly of People's Guard units, offered poor resistance at Katharinenfeld and later at Shulaver, which put others forces in danger. The surprise attack at Hairum cost the Georgians an additional 500 men killed, wounded, or taken prisoner. "

A redirect would also deal with the edit warring over the infobox results. Annwfwn (talk) 13:33, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Armenia, and Georgia (country). Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Giri Balasubramanium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not seem to be notable upon searching for reliable, secondary sources. Also, the creator of this article seems to have a undisclosed connection to the subject. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and India. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Monument of Jiangsu Road

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Currently, has zero in-depth sourcing. Could be redirected to Jiangsu Road (Lhasa), another poorly sourced stub by this same editor, which contains almost all the same information. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2016–17 Młoda Liga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet the requirements set forth by WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Relies exclusively on primary sources and is being used as simply a database for standings and scores. WP:NOTSTATS. There is no indication of significant coverage of this topic. –Aidan721 (talk) 12:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Volleyball, Europe, and Poland. –Aidan721 (talk) 12:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alien abduction claimants

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a POV fork of Alien abduction, which covers the topic in more depth, without the grossly undue credulous waffle herein, and without reducing an overwhelming scientific (etc) consensus to "mainstream" and "skeptics". It is a clear and unambiguous violation of WP:NPOV policy. AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Psychology, and Social science. AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As the nominator states, this is a non-neutral POV article on alien abduction that relies heavily on numerous references to a single source. Given most of the "depth" in the article is using this unreliable source, there is no reason for this forked article.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 12:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nomination. TurboSuperA+_(connect) 13:56, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Egregiously non-neutral, agree with nominator that this is an unnecessary fork. death pact (again) 14:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Hansen (pornographic actor)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It doesn't seem like this one meets WP:GNG. The references are not SIGCOV and most of them don't seem like reliable sources. BuySomeApples (talk) 10:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:01, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't look like the sources are significant coverage, and while I don't know if this recreated version is significantly different from the previously deleted version, it seems that the previous deletion nomination closed with the same finding and it is unlikely that much changed. silviaASH (inquire within) 12:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Following sources seem to be coverage significant enough, considering he has been featured in DNA magazine and made headlines in AVN and XBIZ:

Bright, Richard (2006-08-17). "Porn Star Q&A: Brian Hansen". AVN.
"Meet Brian Hansen". Fleshbot. 2006-04-25.
"COLT Launches Buckshot Man Brian Hansen's Fan Site". XBIZ. 2007-02-06
"BRIAN HANSEN The life and times and pajamas of porn's latest superstar". DNA. No. 81. January 2006.
"Brian Hansen's Grabby Snatch". DNA Magazine #90. July 2007. p. 10. Retrieved 2025-04-20 – via Scribd.
Rice, G. Zisk (2010-01-08). "Buckshot Man Brian Hansen Returns in 'Lotus'". AVN.

A cleanup could be done of unreliable sources, instead of deleting the entire article.

Countdown (Victorious song)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero in-depth coverage. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:39, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:39, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Garde Wilson Lawyers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources are all about Zarah Garde-Wilson or cases she was involved in, but there's nothing that helps the law firm meet WP:NCORP. BuySomeApples (talk) 07:14, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Companies, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Browning

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references are all primary sources with the exception of a WP:FORBESCON article. I couldn't find any SIGCOV on a WP:BEFORE either. BuySomeApples (talk) 07:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, California, and Washington. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Borderline G11. Jclemens (talk) 09:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eric J. Rose

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. There's a podcast interview with him, an local news article about him resigning from the local K9 unit, and a local news article used twice with two different links (issuu andnewspaper's website). The Hollywood Reporter article quotes him briefly but isn't about him or his security company at all. BuySomeApples (talk) 07:07, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Police. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:08, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Farooq (book)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I removed some unverified and unsourced content from the page. It was already a stub, and now it's even shorter. Deletion seems to be the most appropriate option.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 01:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and India. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 01:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:15, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are some references on the Uzbek wiki (uz:Al-faruq) that look promising, but I can only access this one. ~~I've added some context. It could be notable; I lean towards keep.~~ I realized that those sources are considered unreliable by the nominator who removed them recently. Would be useful to know why they are unreliable, but I trust your judgment since I can't read them. Recon rabbit 19:51, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reconrabbit: I initially added the sources while working on the Bibliography of Shibli Nomani. Although they are reliable, they are not directly relevant to the text, which is why I chose to remove them. However, if you find them useful, you're welcome to incorporate them. There is no shortage of credible sources available online. The primary concern is that, in its current state, this article does not meet the standards required for a standalone entry.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 20:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The linked source from the Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities dedicates about two pages to this book, which led me to believe it was worthwhile to use it. If it does not meet the standards for an article on a book, it could be redirected back to Shibli Nomani until someone compiles more substantial information. Recon rabbit 20:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as I don’t see enough here for a stand alone article. Mccapra (talk) 04:32, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. User:Mccapra, where are you suggesting this, and other articles, be Redirected to? Please always identify a target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:22, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m suggesting redirecting to Shibli Nomani, the author, where the work is mentioned. Mccapra (talk) 09:13, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ma'ariful Qur'an

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been tagged for original research, unreliable sources, and unverified content since 2018. Although I have attempted to address these concerns, the article remains poorly sourced and lacks sufficient content to stand as a standalone page. I propose a redirect.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 02:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Islam, and Pakistan. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 02:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the nom, as the page does not have verifiable sources. --Mozzcircuit (talk) 16:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect as proposed by nom or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Muhammad Shafi, the author, as I don’t see enough here for a stand alone article. Mccapra (talk)

Youth Service America

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article lacks notability - specifically, reliable, secondary sources that are not just interviews. WormEater13 (talk) 02:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Washington, D.C.. WormEater13 (talk) 02:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As the nominator says, its the article that lacks citations, not the organization that lacks notability. I have added a half-dozen citations from reliable 3rd party sources and will continue to work on it until the nominator is satisfied. Freechild (talk) 19:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A large majority of the new sources that you've added to the article are interviews with individuals closely connected to the subject, and upon searching for notable sources about the subject, I can only seem to find primary sources. There's also many citations that you've added that don't have URLs. For example, one source you linked is the CEO of Youth Service America (Steve Culbertson) announcing that he will be speaking at his alma mater for a keynote, which is a clear connection to the subject, and is also not related to Youth Service America. WormEater13 (talk) 12:51, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unable to find the necessary coverage to show WP:NORG is met here. All I can find are interviews with the leader and press releases. Let'srun (talk) 01:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it’s the article that needs citations, not inherently the organisation. OMGShay 92 (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as I am finding references and have added them but it can be hard to tell if they are primary or not if there's not a byline. It's challenging to dig things up for organizations. Nnev66 (talk) 21:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fiona Foster

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign of notability, search returns nothing. Allan Nonymous (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom. Allan Nonymous (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Radio, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: Have added two references but the article still needs additional references.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rillington (talk • contribs) 16:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, on the basis that she fronted (as a main or co-host) several TV programmes, especially during the 90s and has been a reporter/presenter in various others. Had difficulty in finding much in the way of WP:SIGCOV specifically about her, although plenty of mentions of programmes/episodes she has been part of, or been the lead reporter in. I have added a ref for the 1993 'Missing' TV series, which does also discuss her personally (career and personal life) aside from the programme. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Aziz Abdul Kareem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod with no attempt to add additional sources. Lacking third party in-depth coverage to meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 04:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Kuwait. LibStar (talk) 04:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I expanded the article with new sources including Al Rai describing him as "the grandfather of training". Subject did much more than just competing at a single Olympics, he had a twelve-year career spanning multiple international championships for Kuwait. A Wikipedian who knows Arabic should take a look at these search results for further coverage. --Habst (talk) 14:40, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Habst's expansion, WP:NBASIC and common sense. Any understanding of the sport and country would indicate that a twelve-year international career with multiple Olympic appearances, and becoming known as the "grandfather of training" for his coaching after his playing career is, I guarantee, something that would be further covered significantly. The issue is that our access to sources from the time are ridiculously poor and this guy has like a dozen names he could have been covered under, and none of us speak Arabic, which makes this extremely hard to search for. Nonetheless a decent article has been developed with his significant accomplishments and coverage has been found showing he was known as a very accomplished figure in Kuwaiti athletics. He's notable. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:44, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per the efforts of habst which seemed to have turned this article from just another Olympic stub to a potentially decent sourced article Scooby453w (talk) 13:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - What secondary sources are we relying on here? Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 15:22, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As i stated the sources provided/referenced by habst namley https://archive.org/search?query=%22%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF+%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B2%D9%8A%D8%B2+%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%85%22&sin=TXT which seems to indicate several sources mentioning him (though I don't know Arabic there seems to be alot of them) Scooby453w (talk) 16:07, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Konyalıya Güzel Derler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little to no coverage of the song, apart from lyrics. No indication of notability. (Please note that this is different from Konyali.) The only source here is a dead link to some website, so there is nothing to merge. Aintabli (talk) 05:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music, and Turkey. Aintabli (talk) 05:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Raigarh (1689)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another failed redirect, later contested by the author of the article. My reasoning is- why doesn't this have coverage around the battle itself? There's no need for aftermath without a substantial coverage of "Battle". Shakakarta (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, Asia, India, and Maharashtra. Shakakarta (talk) 16:16, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant coverage found in reliable sources. More likely rename the article to "Siege of Raigarh" as it is well more known as this event in the books [1][2][3][4]. I suspect a POV forked attempt by the proposer to eliminate the battles that was lost by the Marathas. Hionsa (talk) 17:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merely citing sources won't work, they don't give coverage beyond a few 2-4 lines. Do you even understand what "POV fork" means? Visit WP:POVFORK. Shakakarta (talk) 17:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Hionsa, meets WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk) 06:08, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Saying per nom, when their argument is itself irrational is not gonna help. Let me bother myself to show what the given sources have to say:
- [5]: 3 pages yielded after 'Raigarh' filter search, of which none of these mentions any conflict.
- [6]: hardly yielded 3 lines around the conflict. Note that work of Jadunath was published a century ago.
- [7]: Quite similar to Jacques where the notability is established but lacks coverage.
- [8]: One line of mentions. Shakakarta (talk) 15:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unconvincing source analysis which is more like randomly thrown out of the blue without giving indications of pages. From what I can see the one and only citation in the article has a passing blurb of mentions. FWIW, it could be given entry at List of battles involving the Maratha Confederacy. Heraklios 19:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Deccan Wars. One source—that of Jadunath Sarkar—gives significant coverage across multiple pages. However, as Shakakarta notes above, he was writing in the 1950s and his work is dated. In the seeming absence of modern sources which provide significant coverage—the others cited by Hionsa above most certainly do not—merging this content to Deccan Wars, where it unaccountably seems to be absent, seems the best call. Nonetheless, if modern sources which provide SIGCOV are identified, please ping me. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 7 sources on the page. Sources 3,5,7 sources are same and unreliable WP:AGEMATTERS, about Maasir-i-Alamgiri, an account of Emperor Aurangzeb's(1620-1707) reign that was composed after the death of the emperor by Saqi Musta'd Khan at the behest of Inayetullah Khan Kashmiri, the emperor's last secretary. Source 1,6 are same by Jacques with no significant coverage. Source 2,4 have no significant coverage on the Battle either. RangersRus (talk) 12:31, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am leaning towards merging, but I see many similar pages marked for deletion, and the issue is the same: lack of reliable sources. The sources are being randomly thrown together, and the pages are not yet ready for Wikipedia. But they may be notable. Unicorbia (talk) 13:53, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG ,clearly lacks indepth coverage.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:58, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Comments on the merge to Deccan Wars suggestion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 05:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: In case this was kept, kindly move the page to Battle of Raigarh which is a DAB only listing this article. Thanks and No Opinion on the AFD itself. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:18, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gigantis, the Fire Monster

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems unnecessary. Gigantis, the Fire Monster is already covered in detail at the Godzilla Raids Again article, in the American version subsection. Gigantis was just a shorter English dubbed version of Godzilla Raids Again. It wasn't a "heavily localized" version like Godzilla, King of the Monsters! or Godzilla 1985 were; those had some Japanese footage removed in favor of new US-produced footage that was inserted for the US release, as well as the original director's intent altered by the Americans.

But Gigantis doesn't have that -- at least not to a severe degree. Both Godzilla Raids Again and Gigantis are practically the same film, save for some minor creative liberties in the English dub's dialogue. It seems like overkill to dedicated a whole article to an English dub that has minimal coverage that, again, is already covered in detail in another article.

If additional proof is needed of the article's lack of importance, no one's edited on that article since 2006. Even it's own creator, Keratos2190, has been inactive since 2006 as well. I propose simply merging it with Godzilla Raids Again. Armegon (talk) 05:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Film. Armegon (talk) 05:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - When I looked through sources for this article, there were a lot of sources. These are the best ones I could find [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]. Once again, this isn't just an WP:IDONTLIKEIT, it's an WP:IDONTLIKEWHOCREATEDIT. But also, not only is it an WP:IDONTLIKEIT, it's an WP:IDONTLIKEWHOISFIXINGIT. When I was exhausted from my first phase of reworking the article, I was expecting you to add more information and sources, but no, you're just nominating things for deletion. Do you actually have problems with my writing???? GojiraFan1954 (talk) 07:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Now I'm onto my second phase of reworking the article. GojiraFan1954 (talk) 09:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: a merge would be highly undue and the film meeting the requirements for notability, a standalone page is possible. I don’t understand this nomination. -Mushy Yank. 12:13, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Needs work, but is clearly independently notable. It is not a mere English dub of the original film. silviaASH (inquire within) 12:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per WP:SK#3 and WP:SK#1 and speedy close per WP:SNOW. This does not sound like a AFD nomination. This feels like a rant on the subject itself. Plus, I'm certain nom did not do a proper WP:BEFORE. If you want to merge the article, kindly open a discussion on the talk page and not nominate the article on AFD. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 12:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above. This feels more fitting for a merge discussion, and while I normally advocate for keeping discussions to the AfD venue, I feel as though in this case this conversation would be better held at a merger, where independent notability can be more adequately discussed. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Northeast International Model United Nations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had created this page, but am not fully sure if the sources currently listed or the sources available are enough to establish notability. So would love to get this into a deletion discussion, to get a consensus soon. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, and Nagaland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It looks like you're the only user who has substantively edited the article. If you want the article deleted, you can tag it with G7. I don't think AfD is the appropriate venue to seek help with improving it, but I'm not sure what is, although someone more familiar with cases like these may provide more meaningful advice. If you don't want to delete it but aren't sure it's ready for publication yet, it can probably be moved to your userspace or draft space to allow you to improve it. silviaASH (inquire within) 12:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of longest vines

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately, this list fails on the guidelines for notability of lists. WP:NLIST I have not been able to locate any source that discusses longest vines as a group. In addition I have not been able to locate any sources that support the claims for notability/inclusion of most of the list items. For example "Longest monocot". "The longest parasitic vine." etc.

This is a clear example of WP:SYNTH with the editors doing original research. This would make a great article in a popular science magazine, but WP:FORUM. Wikipedia is not a place for this kind of original publication.

I discussed these issues with the article's primary editor on the talk page, but they have not been able to provide any source that would deal with the notability issue. I placed a synth notice on the page in October of 2024 and no other editor has responded on the talk page or provided a source.

I don't know that there is anywhere appropriate to redirect this article to. Maybe to matchbox bean (Entada phaseoloides) as the probable longest vine. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 04:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology and Organisms. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 04:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clayton Adams

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. The current sources in the article are all primary to the teams the subject played for, while a BEFORE got some results for unrelated people and passing mentions like [[16]] but nothing significant. Let'srun (talk) 04:07, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Georgia (U.S. state), Louisiana, Tennessee, and Texas. Let'srun (talk) 04:07, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Ark (newspaper)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable newspaper, does not pass WP:NCORP. Sources are either WP:PRIMARY or local in scope, a WP:BEFORE search reveals no significant coverage of note. Author has a WP:COI and likely undisclosed WP:PAID interest. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 03:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Apologies that I’m relatively new at this. I attempted to disclose my conflict that I’m the co-owner and editor of this newspaper. I was not paid by anyone to create this page; I did it in my free time on a weekend. The list of California papers ([[List of newspapers in California#Daily newspapers]]) is full of dozens of other weeklies with nothing exceptionally notable about them at all, and with circulation the same or smaller than ours. We’ve been named the best small newspaper in America several times by the National Newspaper Association (National Newspaper Association and California News Publishers Association (California News Publishers Association), which seems more significantly notable than than other non-daily newspapers with non-deleted wikis, eg the Salinas Valley TribuneSalinas Valley Tribune — with all due respect to my colleagues there! Thanks for your consideration and happy to answer any questions. Kzhessel (talk) 05:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Kzhessel (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ty G. Allushuski

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources do not colloborate information and at most could be used as external links. I cannot find sources otherwise. Roasted (talk) 03:22, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Sports, and Mississippi. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails notability criteria. I cannot find any evidence to satisfy the notability criteria for a BLP. This is the extent of biographical content: "Ty G. Allushuski (born May 23, 1986)", that reduces this article to a resume. The subject's article does not qualify as a pseudo biography as there is no single event of notability. There is LinkedIn, Wikiwand, Facebook, and other promotional or generally acceptable sources. It seems nearly everybody wants a Wikipedia article. -- Otr500 (talk) 13:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Westbrook (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Upon searching up the subject, I don't see any reliable sources available to add to this article, which leaves me wondering if the subject is even notable in the first place. The current state of the article also only has one reference. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, United Kingdom, and England. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I have added a reference to the Grove Encyclopaedia article; along with the Larkin work already referenced in the article, that makes two reference books containing entries about the subject, which I think is sufficient for WP:MUSICBIO criterion 1. AllyD (talk) 08:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I see many refs in authoritative publications on jazz, contemporary music and related topics. Admittedly there is not much in depth coverage but I believe this passes criterion 3 of WP:NCREATIVE - “ The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work.” Mccapra (talk) 10:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delos W. Emmons

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Individual is listed as a founder of Huntington, WV, however the sourcing does not bear this out. Rather, he was appointed by the founder to manage the purchase of land for the city. Additionally, there is little to no WP:SIGCOV of this individual, with most mentions only in passing. The only secondary source writing that really focuses on this person is an entry in the local newspaper's series on old pictures of the city, one of which includes a photo of the subject. Recommend this content be merged with Huntington, West Virginia#History. nf utvol (talk) 01:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and West Virginia. nf utvol (talk) 01:25, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Huntington, West Virginia#History - agree with nominator. I believe it would be best to merge the article into the history section of Huntington, WV. I don't think the subject is notable enough to warrant a standalone article at the moment, unless further sources are presented. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with merge based on the meagre information about Emmons himself, and excluding information about his family, which would only be expected if he warranted a more expansive article or some of them were notable enough to have their own. With no prejudice against recreating it if enough facts of significance come to light about his role in developing the city. If he was primarily Collis P. Huntington's land agent, then there may not be enough to do so. I note that it's often difficult to locate local historical data; the types of recent sources cited here only provide "factoids", and period sources aren't easily available online. P Aculeius (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: The brother-in-law of the founder does not inherit notability. There is likely little doubt that the subject was instrumental in the establishment and growth of the place. This is the way such towns, which include railroad and lumber towns, were built and grew. Lacking sources, this does not afford him co-founder status. -- Otr500 (talk) 14:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tahlita Buethke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in independent sources. Lower level amateur footballer. The-Pope (talk) 01:22, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Australia. The-Pope (talk) 01:22, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

British Columbia Conservatory of Music

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

COI or UPE editing of institute with not enough in-depth coverage to show that they meet WP:GNG. C4 was declined, but still fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:10, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Education, Schools, and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:44, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shine On (Jet song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable song. 0 coverage in sources. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:09, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, and United Kingdom. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:09, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: For the most part all non-notable songs can be redirected to albums, and non-notable albums can be redirected to band/musician page. This one can be redirected to Shine On (Jet album). LastJabberwocky (talk) 21:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above reason. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 08:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I've added references - clearly satisfies the requirements of WP:NSONG - charted internationally and has featured in numerous television shows. Dan arndt (talk) 08:28, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep}: Agree with Dan arndt, several SIGCOV sources; NME and LA Times each wrote an article dedicated solely to Shine On. LastJabberwocky (talk) 21:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@LastJabberwocky, both of those sources are album reviews—this article is about the title track. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 09:12, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, no consensus yet, can we get a review of the article's sources?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:44, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to album; it's important to note that all of these sources are about the album Shine On—not the song. Song fails NSONG. The article also seems to cite UGC from Sputnik Music. All of this can be merged to the album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 09:15, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to the parent album: I previously voted for keep, but upon closer inspection (looking at it in the morning), I couldn't find any mentions of the songs. Mostly general discussions about the album and the Pitchfork monkey. LastJabberwocky (talk) 09:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dynda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nn musc group. Tagged sicne July 2024 with no improvmnt --Altenmann >talk 00:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. No reliable sources found upon searching the subject, which means there is a significant amount of reasoning to believe that the subject is not notable.

WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Singapore. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]